1. Introduction
Understanding
of theories about how people learn and the ability to apply these theories in
teaching mathematics are important prerequisites for effective mathematics
teaching. Many people have approached the study of intellectual development and
the nature of learning in different ways. This has resulted in several theories
of learning. Although there is still some disagreement among psychologist,
learning theorists, and educators about how people learn and the most effective
methods for promoting learning, there are many areas of agreement. The
different theories of learning should not be viewed as a set of completing
theories, one of which is true and the other false. Each theory can be regarded
as a method of organizing and studying some of the many variables in learning
and intellectual development and teachers can select and apply elements of each
theory in their own classes. You may find that some theories are more
applicable to you and your students because they seem to be appropriate models
for the learning environment and the students with whom you interact.
In the past many mathematics teachers,
educators neglected the application of theories about the nature of learning
and centered their teaching methods on knowledge of the subject. Recent
findings in learning theory, better understanding of mental development and new
applications of theory to classroom teaching now enable teachers to choose
teaching strategies according to information about the nature of learning. The
purpose of this report is to present the Ausubel view on Learning Mathematics.
Rationale
of the study:
Different types of learning theories
are adopted to teach in the mathematics class on the basis of size of the
class, class environment as well as about the prescribed curriculum course book
and topic. We have the knowledge those learning theories which are used in the
class room by studying learning theories, we can find that the history of
theory, rationalization of the invented theory, relation to the other theories,
implications in the teaching room and limitations.
Limitations
of the study:
In this section, it is tried to
explain about learning theory developed by David P. Ausubel. Although this
elaboration may not be the fulfillment due to the lack of preparations duration
as well as the reference books and mathematical reports. This study is limited
on the basis of our course of study prescribed in the level of Master's Degree
of education. So all of the required knowledge about this theory may not be provided
by this short note or group report.
Purpose of this paper:
This
group report on David P. Ausubel's Theory of Meaningful learning mathematics
has been prepared for the practical fulfillment of the requirement of the
completion practical part of math Ed.519: Foundation of Mathematics Education.
This report attempts to cite and critically appraisal of Ausubel's Theory of
meaningful learning in varied prospective specially this report contains introduction, meaning of
mathematics and its philosophy, steps in learning, factors affecting
learning theories, different learning
theories, details of Ausubel's theory of meaningful learning, implication in
mathematics teaching and conclusion and suggestions.
Learning
and teaching of mathematics is not an easy job as it is thought to be.
Mathematics teachers come across various discipline and pedagogical problem
while teaching mathematics in classroom. Many mathematicians and mathematics
educators have investigated and found out various method of solving those
teaching learning problem in terms of mathematics learning theories. But none
of them have arrived at a universal theory that can be applied for all learning
situations. So the choices of learning theories and teaching strategies are
left open for the individual teacher. So that he could make a rational decision
in formulating his own strategy that can best suit his students. So a teacher
must understand all the theories of learning and method of teaching.
The general objective of this study is
to know about the learning theory developed by David P. Ausubel but the
behavioral (measurable) objectives are as follows:
1)
To introduce Ausubel's views on learning mathematics.
2)
To describe process of learning mathematics.
3)
To elaborate stages of learning mathematical concepts.
4)
To express principles of meaningful verbal learning.
5)
To write problems in Ausubel's view.
6) To apply Ausubel theory in the
classroom
2. Factors affecting learning
process:
Learning is a mental process due to the development so it has not
equality for all persons. From classroom achievement it is proved that all the
students on the same class cannot solve any problem on the same level because
of some affecting factors of learning. To be a good teacher we should be familiar
with those affecting factors. They are as follows:
i.
Environment
ii.
Maturity
iii.
Role
of teacher
iv.
Learning
method
v.
Motivation
vi.
Intelligence
vii.
Physical
and mental health
viii.
Emotional
factors
ix.
Heredity
x.
Nature
of material
xi.
Interest
and aptitude.
3. Steps in Learning:
We couldn't earn the learning knowledge and
skill automatically. In any subject we could gain the knowledge and skills by
study, research and discovery and with the interactions of environment.
According to psychology we learn anything in different steps such steps are as
follows:
i.
Goal
ii.
Motivation
iii.
Recreation
iv.
Obstacles
v.
Response
vi.
Reinforcement
vii.
Generalization
4. Learning Mathematics Learning Theories:
The word 'learn' is derived from American English language which means
to receive knowledge and comprehension through experience of the study.
Learning is the basic behavior of human beings. The main fact of learning is to
change the behavior of learner. It plays vital role in development of innate
power of the learner.
Especially, how does the teacher teach? Before
we can answer this question, we must answer first another question. How does
pupil learn? The art of teaching, if is to be effective; we must be based on
adequate theory of learning. Since, the year 1900, the psychologist has analyzed
the working of learning in a very board manner even including the learning by
animals. A learning theory is a theory about the mental growth of the child and
about interaction of mental growth and structure of a provided subject matter.
4.1 Condition of Learning Mathematics:
Learning
is facilitated when the learner has the opportunity to see relationship of new
behavior or knows how the new behavior is part of some larger plan.
The
guidelines consisting of assumptions
that have been found to be useful in practice to mathematics learning outlined
by Bassler, Otto C. and Kolb, John R. in their book learning to Teach Secondary
Mathematics.
1.
An individual learns all new behavior because of his interaction with his
total environment.
2.
Learning is facilitated if the behavior to be learned is consistent with
the learner’s view of the world and his view of himself and his role in the
world.
3.
Learning is facilitated when the learner has previously attained and can
recall all the prerequisite knowledge necessary for learning a specified
behavior.
4.
Learning is facilitated if the learner perceives the task being
meaningful and applicable.
5.
Learning is facilitated when the goal or outcomes of the task to be
learned is known to the learner.
6.
Learning is facilitated when the learner is actively participates in the
performances of the task to be learned rather than passively receives
information.
7.
Learning is facilitated when erroneous behavior is eliminated and when
the learner can distinguish between behaviors which may be confused with the behavior
to be learned.
8.
Learning is facilitated when the learner is informed of his progress in
relation to the goal to be attained.
9.
Learning is facilitated when a planned program of spaced continuous
development of the behavior is provided.
10.
Learning is facilitated when the
learner has the opportunity to practice the task with a wide variety of
problems in many contexts different from that in which behavior was learned.
4.2 Different Mathematical Learning Theories
Mathematical
concepts are very difficult problem to understand and to know. It can make the
learners nervous sometimes. So the most of the number contributed to the
development of mathematical learning theories. These learning theories play
vital role in teaching mathematics and to solve the problem in mathematics.
Among of them some important learning theories that are very useful in teaching
mathematics are following:
a. David P. Ausubel's theory of
meaningful learning.
b. Zoltan Paul Diene views on learning
mathematics.
c. R.M. Gagne's multiple learning
theories.
d. Jean Piaget theory of cognitive
development.
e. J.S.Bruner's theory of learning
mathematics.
f. R.Skemp's psychological learning of
mathematics.
4.3 Needs
of studying Learning Theory:
The
teacher of mathematics should understand the most recent developments in
learning theory. Undoubtedly competence in school administration beings with
competence in the essential of the learning process. The social goals of
learning, the psychological factors of
learning, the method or procedure of learning, the subject matter content of
learning, the aids to learning such as laboratories and library, the physical
development of youth and the physical and mental health of the students. In
spite of the fact that on single theory of learning has been developed which
supplies a total explanation of human learning. There are six major agreements
among the educational psychologist which should be understood by the teachers
of mathematics in school.
1.
The motivation is essential that learners should desire to learn or
learning is not likely to occur.
2.
The transfer of training is not likely to happen automatically transfer
of training is more likely to occur if experiences are meaningful in term of
goals of the learners.
3.
That mere repetition or exercise or drill is not necessarily conductive
to learning but they are likely to be when repetition or drill is experienced
because learners see that these activities are related to their goals
4.
That learning is not merely a matter of change while learning might be
variable. It is usually related to goals or purpose of learners rather than to
purpose of teachers.
5.
That response are modified by their consequences; plans of action which
seem to propel learners toward their goals are more likely to learned; those
which seem to divert learners from their goals are less likely to be learned.
6.
That learning is in pair a process of discriminating one situation or one
plan of action from another in meaningful patterns which are related to
learner's goal.
4.4 Misconceptions about Learning:
In 1944, Burton outlined some basic
misconceptions about learning.
1. The process of learning is often
regarded as mere memorizing.
2. Learning is thought as purely
intellectual.
3. Facts and verbalisms are looked upon
as satisfactory outcomes.
4. Transfer of training is automatic.
5. Attitudes and emotional reactions are
secondary.
5. Ausubel’s Theory of Meaningful Learning
5.1 Reception and Discovery Learning
David P. Ausubel raised the issued of
Reception learning fiercely in the field of mathematics learning about 1960
A.D. His main concern was when we go to inter in the learning process we should
provide the clear concept to the students, what is gong to learn? Which is the
main way of learning? In the reception learning students do not discover the
new matter they get the content which is meaningfully presented. The learning
environment should be appropriate, first of all try to make the positive
attitude of student to the subject matter which in going to learn. Learning
should be meaningful and related with prerequisite knowledge. The learning is
generally known of Reception learning.
In general discovery means attaining
knowledge by the use of one’s own intellectual or physical resources. In a
narrow sense, discovery is learning, which occurs as the result of learner
manipulating structuring and transferring the information, so that the pupils
field the new information. In the discovery learning the learners may make a
conjecture, formulate and hypothesis, or find a mathematics truth by using
inductive or deductive processes, observation and extrapolation. There are two
types of discover learning, one is pure discovery and another is directed
discover method. Discovery methods of learning make the students able to decide
any infrastructure and develop the felling of independency also the habit of
inquiry. Discoveries can be made by students working together on the small
group or by students working individually on laboratory exercises. There are
mainly two types of discovery lessons which are inductive disorder lesion and
deductive discovery lessons. Inductive
discovery lessons in lower school mathematics are most appropriate for the
children. Who are well into Piaget’s stages of concrete operations? Deductive
discovery lessons are most appropriate into the class of higher school
mathematics in order to the order students who are well into Piaget’s stage of
formal operation because these students are better equipped intellectually.
Meaningful and Rote Learning:
Meaningful leaning refer primarily to a distinctive
kind of learning process and only secondarily to a meaningful learning outcome
attainment of meaning that the completion of such a process. Meaningful
learning is as a process presupposes, in turn, both that the learner employs a
meaningful learning set and the material, he/she learn is potentially
meaningful to him/he. Conversely no matter how manful the learner is set may
be, neither the process nor outcome of learning can possibly by meaningful nor
learning task itself is devoid of potential meaning. There are three hampering
factors of meaningful learning. They are related with mental development of the
student, the motivational factor & the memorization.
The rote learning mainly concern with
the memorization learning. It is ancient types of learning system. It is
related to the knowledge to the students. It provides the single subject matter
on which the student knows that subject matter by memorization Rote learning
ignore the meaningful learning. In the presently rote learning is the burning problem
in the field of mathematics. Most of Under Developed Countries practice rote
learning in the class of mathematics. So mathematics became so hard subject.
And we call “no mind no mathematics”. Mathematics is gaining through
memorization like wise Ramayana Veda etc.
5.2 Preconditions for Meaningful
Reception Learning:
As Ausubel has given opinion about
preconditions for meaningful reception learning (MRL). There are mainly two
preconditions for meaningful reception learning. Firstly, MRL can be taken
place in such a student who has a good meaningful learning set. Such kind of
students connects new learning to his previous knowledge. There are some
students who do not understand the underlying meaning of subject matter rather
what then do is that then just memorize the new information and do not grasp
the real concept. Such student forgets and become confuse with previously
memorized mathematical structures.
And the second precondition for MRL
is that the learner’s cognitive structure should be related to the learning
task. The previous meaningful learning provides an anchor for new learning so
that new learning and retention do not require rote learning. This second
precondition needs the well organization of learners existing knowledge.
5.3 Factors Hampering Meaningful Learning
There are so many factors
affecting or hampering meaningful learning. Some of the factors have been
mentioned and described precisely.
1. Level of mental development: To learn
the mathematical concepts meaningfully there should be mature enough and the
level of mental development should match learning concept.
2. Lack of sufficient motivation: The
learners must be motivated before teaching/learning activities so that they
learn meaningfully.
And, thirdly, some teachers think
that the learners must follow only my methods of teaching and learning. Such
teachers expect definitions to be reproduced, steps of rules. Problem solving
rules to be done as he wants. As a result, the learners can’t learn in their
own way.
5.4 Strategies for Meaningful
Verbal Learning:
Since, the Ausubel believes, the major job of education is to
teach the discipline, tow conditions must be satisfied .First the discipline
must be presented to student so that the structure of the discipline is
stabilized within each discipline is extremely powerful and that the learner
can make maximal use this ideas by them with his old ideas and making new kind
of structures.
The second condition in teaching a discipline is to make the materials
meaningful to the learner. To ensure meaningful learning, the teacher must help
students build linkage between their own cognitive structure and the structure
if the discipline being taught. Each new concepts and principles within the
disciple must be related to relevant, previously learned concepts and
principles, which are in the learner's cognitive structure.
5.5 Implications of
Ausubel's Theory in mathematics teaching:
The Ausubel's theory of meaningful learning is very
useful as well as effective in mathematics teaching when they are connected in
different situations of mathematics teaching.
i.
Before
teaching new mathematical concepts, teacher should motivate the students and
relate the new concepts with pre-knowledge of the students so that the students
will be positive in the concepts and ready to learn. Teaching should be done
according to the need and interest of students in meaningful way.
ii.
Teaching
materials should be meaningful to the learner. To ensure meaningful learning,
the teacher must help students to build linkage between their own cognitive
structures and structure of the discipline being taught. For example; to teach
fundamental concepts of geometry the expository method is better than discovery
method.
iii.
Before
teaching a mathematical concept, the teacher should determine the steps that
are to be in sequential structure, where teacher should describe each step
meaningfully and appropriately, otherwise students can not learn in meaningful
way. Description of each step of learning is possible only in good expository
method as that it is applicable in meaningful learning and weak students can
learn easily. The problem solving or discovery method helps to the learner to
memorize the solution of the problem that leads to the learner to follow the rote
learning which is meaningless.
iv.
Using
teaching materials related to subject matter to make teaching effective,
permanent and meaningful must do mathematics teaching. For example, the teaching
concepts of circle will be very effective if circular objects are used as
teaching materials and the concept of circle can be taught effectively relating
it with radius, diameter, circumference, centre etc. it is possible only by
expository method and not by discovery method.
v.
Expository
method should be used in teaching new concepts in mathematics. If other
methods, such as discovery and problem solving method are used, they create
confusion to the students as well as consume much time in concept development.
For example; in teaching Pythagorean relation, pure discovery method becomes
time consuming and less effective while expository method is an effective
method and problem is saved easily by this method. Expository method helps the
students to understand the solution of the problem in meaningful way.
vi.
The
students having good mathematical skills and verbal capacity should be taught
by verbal expository method. This method increase debating, reasoning, imaginary,
problem solving powers and conjectures making ability to the students. For
example, to prove sum of interior angle of polygon is 180(n-2), we can use
expository method more than by problem solving and discovery methods.
5. Conclusion:
The teaching strategy that Ausubel suggests in order to
promote meaningful verbal learning through the use of progressive initiation
and interrogative reconciliation is to apply advanced organizer. An advance
organizer is a preliminary statement, discussion or other activities which
introduce new materials at a higher level of generality, Inclusiveness and
abstraction in the actual new learning task. The organizer is selected for its
appropriateness in explaining and integrating the new materials and its purpose
to provide the learner with conceptual structure into which they will integrate
the new materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment